Comments on: Asynchronous method invocation in Spring 3.0

By: macrotea

macrotea — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:04:57 +0000

hi
i am a chinese spring developer
thx for your introduction

By: Concurrent Code Using Groovy « Josef's Blog

Concurrent Code Using Groovy « Josef's Blog — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:05:55 +0000

[...] 2Aug10-18:06 Wow, synchrony in action. In my Google News Reader just saw a notification for “Asynchronous Method Invocation in Spring“. Details are shown here. [...]

By: Marc

Marc — Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:06:06 +0000

When used in combination with Hibernate, I run into org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException s
What’s the best way to create an open session in view for the Async method?

By: qbe

qbe — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:19:31 +0000

@stats

You can use an http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/Future.html as return value of an Async annotated method.

By: Vinay

Vinay — Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:06:36 +0000

@stas When you say outcome , what do you exactly mean ?
The aysnc method will do job in background and exit. You can log the message when the method completes its execution.

By: stas

stas — Tue, 05 Oct 2010 09:24:01 +0000

Is there a way to get an outcome of the ansync method?

By: Vinay

Vinay — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:06:20 +0000

@Paramesh Thanks for pointing out Paramesh. It should be Thread.sleep(5000). I fixed it.

By: Paramesh

Paramesh — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:18:38 +0000

Hello ,

Its really good, I would like know about where did you specify the 5 seconds in above.. I notice that below one in above program ..
The program will not exit and after 5 second you will see .. but i noticed that in Thread.sleep(10000)..

Please advice

By: Vinay

Vinay — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:56:20 +0000

Excellent point Michael. Thanks a lot fro bringing this up.

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:13:40 +0000

Thanks for that post!

A small hint if you using async and annotation-based transactionhandling. You will need the async call before the method or facade with the @transactional otherwise the transactioncontext will not be expanded to the new thread….

greetings michael